Design a site like this with
Get started

Gone With The Winds Of Political Correctness

Those who don’t learn from history are doomed to repeat it.” So said Spanish philosopher George Santayana in a famous quote that made such an impression on Winston Churchill that he echoed it in British Parliament just after the end of World War II. Some might want to keep that sentiment in mind if they don’t want 2021 to look suspiciously like 1921. Or 1821 even.

This came to mind today upon hearing that HBO was pulling Gone with the Wind from its newly-launched streaming service. The reason? Some people complain that the 1939 movie about the Civil War in Georgia is “racist”. The Black people are portrayed as slaves, people subservient to Whites and in general not as smart (at least in conventional educational terms) nor as revered or wealthy.

Which would be a problem if it were a movie set in the present day. Especially if it was one which was deemed to be a documentary rather than a work of fiction. In the context of mid-19th Century Dixie, however, it doesn’t seem like much of a stretch. In fact, any other presentation would seem phony and ridiculous. History people!

I haven’t seen the film actually. I guess it just isn’t my theatrical cup of tea, given that it came out more than two decades before my birth I could have. It has been readily available for years on VHS and then DVD, not to mention quite a few TV showings. Turns out I’ve only seen 26 out of the AFI’s (American Film Institute) “100 Greatest Movies of All-time”. I mean, how can we be talking “greatest films” and not have Groundhog Day there? But that doesn’t stop it being a widely-loved and important movie. The Film Institute ranked it as the fourth greatest of the 20th Century. In their latest list, it comes in as the sixth best ever. The Academy back in the day agreed too, giving it eight Oscars including Best Picture, Best Actress and Best Director. So popular has the three-hour plus film back then that the Governor of Georgia declared a special state holiday on the day it opened back in 1939; so popular has it been since that day that it’s said to be the highest-grossing film of all-time when box office tallies were adjusted for inflation. That’s big. That’s history in itself, in fact.

But despite all the love for it, HBO – who undoubtedly had to pay some pretty pennies to buy its rights – now think it too dangerous for people to view. They say the movie depicts “racial prejudices that were wrong then and are wrong now.” They fail to see that any depiction of the American South set 160 or more years ago inherently must depict racial prejudice for it to have any value whatsoever.

We’ve been through this all before, with libraries which wanted to pull Huckleberry Finn from their shelves and schools which stopped teaching To Kill A Mockingbird for the same reasons. The latter of course is all the more galling given that the main character is a White man who goes against the prevailing beliefs and norms, not to mention the Ku Klux Klan of his early-20th Century Alabama community and legally defends an innocent Black man. But that wouldn’t stop the most sensitive types from complaining that the Black people in those novels weren’t universally held in high regard in their Southern communities nor holders of prestigious positions.

I don’t subscribe to HBO Max, and if I did I’d probably prefer to spend 220 minutes binge-watching nine episodes of Friends than watching Gone with the Wind. I mean, sorry but Vivien Leigh is no Jennifer Aniston and in all likelihood Clark Gable’s “Rhett” isn’t as witty as Matthew Perry’s “Chandler”. But that doesn’t mean I don’t think the movie should be there for those who want to view it. Actually, if I had signed up after viewing ads they ran showing it as a feature you’d get, I’d probably be a bit P.O.’d if they pulled it.

What happened to George Floyd was terrible, cruel and criminal. That’s obvious. So too was the fact that slavery was alive, well and revered in the South many years ago. What isn’t terrible or cruel is telling the stories. So I say HBO, bring back Gone with the Wind. If you decide to have the family watch it, go ahead and explain the context of Georgia and the Confederacy in the 1850s. Talk about the Civil War with the children, why people felt it was necessary to fight their neighbors to the south. Talk about equality and our nation’s values. If you actually think that Gone with the Wind perpetuates inequality, talk about that too in context of it being a hugely-popular film that’s been watched millions of times over 80-plus years. But go ahead and watch, and go ahead and talk about the issues.

Watch it or don’t watch it. Frankly my dear, I don’t give a damn. But I do care that we have a chance and a choice. And if you don’t want to speed a repetition of history along, you probably should too.

7 Replies to “Gone With The Winds Of Political Correctness”

  1. I disagree with the Vivien Leigh vs Jennifer Aniston part but that is all…Leigh was hot. Oh… their email address is if anyone wants to email. I did…Let people decide what they want to watch on their own. We do not need HBO to decide or act as a censor for us. What about their movies that offend skinny or fat people…do they pull those also?

    It is a great movie…I watched it around a month ago again for the third time. I saw this last night and was beyond pissed off. It would beat most movies today easily with no contest…not as good as Citizen Kane but up there.

    Dave, it’s been a hell of a day…I’ll get your other posts tonight.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Hope your day got better!
      Well, we’ll disagree about Leigh but I’ll give you VL vs Lisa Kudrow…
      It’s ridiculous. I hope they were innundated with complaints over it. Like you suggest, there’s something in most movies that’s gonna upset SOMEBODY. Where does it all end?
      It’s never been a movie that’s interested me a lot but I might give it a view some lazy afternoon or something if I come across it on TV or streaming.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. I got a reply saying… “Due to a large volume of emails, we may not be able to reply to each email we receive.”… yea I bet they got a large number…this hit a nerve.

        What if violence offended people? Many people it does but that is ok.

        It was the first time Bailey watched it last month. They pack a lot of movie in that. Clark Gable is the biggest man’s man you will ever see. Very funny in it.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. What I don’t understand is why now? Why all the hoopla about pulling a movie depicting slavery right in the middle of the most volatile times in US history? To keep people agitated? What about a more recent movie, “12 Years A Slave”? Are they going to pull that one? or “Harriet Tubman”? We need to educate our young people about what our country was founded on, the good, the bad, and the ugly. Watching any of these films gives parents an opportunity to process what they are seeing for their kids. Just like people want to say The Holocaust was a hoax, the worst thing is to try to sweep the ugliness of slavery under a rug.

    Liked by 2 people

    1. Yep! I actually doubt HBO intended to keep people agitated, but it will have that effect. They should keep in mind the adage “for every action there’s an equal and opposite reaction.” This is going to get more people irate and there’s going to be a blowback eventually.
      I agree too that the art is a way to generate discussion and remember. If the ultra-liberals who want it and all other “offensive” films and books banned go too far, it will become easy to just deny that that time in history existed.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: